EU GAMBLING AT THE INTERSECTION OF POLICY AND LITIGATION

Main Article Content

Anastasios Kaburakis
Ryan M. Rodenberg

Abstract

Given its high level of regulation, the gambling industry must be able to react quickly to litigation and resulting change in policy (and enforcement thereof).  Using a case study approach, this short paper highlights how the twin issues of policy and litigation have recently impacted the gambling industry in the European Union.  Examples focus on recent developments in the EU that outline the relevant contours of the European Court of Justice’s jurisprudence, with a special emphasis on the dynamic situation in Greece.   These examples shape the ensuing discussion of the future of both the regulation and litigation of the EU’s gambling industry.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

P Aho ‘Overview of the Latest Developments in Gaming Legislation in the Nordic Countries’ (2009) http://gaminglaweu.eu/archive/archive2009/overview-of-the-latest-developments-in-gaming-legislation-in-the-nordic-countries/.

S Asensi ‘Spain: First Guidelines About the Future of Online Regulation’ (2010) http://gaminglaweu.eu/news/spain-first-guidelines-about-the-future-of-online-regulation/.

D Doukas and J Anderson ‘The Dice is Loaded: Commercial Gambling and the European Court of Justice’ (2008) 27 Oxford Yearbook of European Law 237.

W Eadington ‘The Future of Online Gambling in the United States and Elsewhere’ (2004) 23 (2) Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 214.

W Eadington ‘Gambling Policy in the European Union: Monopolies, Market Access, Economic Rents, and Competitive Pressures Among Gaming Sectors in the Member States’ (2011) www.unr.edu/gaming/Tillburg%20final%20draft%203-14-07.pdf.

J Franssen ‘New Government Spells Overnight Change For Dutch Gambling’ (2011) http://gaminglaweu.eu/videos/1871.

A Kaburakis ‘European Union Law, Gambling, and Sport Betting. European Court of Justice, Member States Case Law, and Policy’ in P Anderson, et al (eds.) Sport Betting and the Law (T.M.C. Asser Press, 2011).

Q Mancini ‘2010 Outlook of the Italian gaming market’ (2010) http://gaminglaweu.eu/news/2010-outlook-of-the-italian-gaming-market/.

M Monov ‘The ECJ upheld its case law regarding online gambling services: towards 27 national gambling legislations?’ (2010) http://gaminglaweu.eu/news/the-ecj-upheld-its-case-law-regarding-online-gambling-services-towards-27-national-gambling-legislations.

T Verbiest ‘The Interface Between Ex Ante Online Gambling Sector-Specific Regulation And Ex Post Competition Rules: Legal Analysis Of The French Model’ (2010) http://gaminglaweu.eu/news/xthe-interface-between-ex-ante-online-gambling-sector-specific-regulation-and-ex-post-competition-rules-legal-analysis-of-the-french-model.

T Verbiest ‘UK’s Remote Gambling Regime To Be Reviewed In Light of Rapid Technological Advances’ (2010) http://gaminglaweu.eu/news/uks-remote-gambling-regime-to-be-reviewed-in-light-of-rapid-technological-advances.

P Vlaemminck and P De Wael ‘The European Union Regulatory Approach of Online Gambling and its Impact on the Global Gaming Industry’ (2003) 7 Gaming Law Review 177.