Main Article Content

Ingo Fiedler


Online poker is a data goldmine. Recording actual gambling behavior gives rise to a host of research opportunities. Still, investigations using such data are rare with the exception of nine pioneering studies by Harvard Medical School which are reviewed here. This paper fills part of the vacuum by analyzing the gambling habits of a sample of 2,127,887 poker playing identities at Pokerstars over a period of six months. A couple of playing variables are operationalized and were analyzed on their own as well as connected with each other in form of the playing volume ($ rake a player has paid in a time frame).The main findings confirm the results of the Harvard studies: most online poker players only play a few times and for very low stakes. An analysis of the relationship between the playing habits shows that they reinforce each other with the exception of the playing frequency which moderates gambling involvement. The average values of the playing habits are considerably higher due to a small group of intense players: the 99% percentile player has a playing volume that is 552 times higher than that of the median player (US$2,685), and 1% of the players account for 60% of playing volume (10% for even 91%). This group is analyzed more thoroughly, and a discussion shows that the first impulse to peg intense players as (probable) pathological gamblers is wrong. Rather, future research is needed to distinguish problem gamblers from professional players. 

Article Details



R F Baumeister, K D Vohs, and D C Funder ’Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements. Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?’ (2007)Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396-403.

J Braverman, and H J Shaffer, ‘How do gamblers start gambling: Identifying behavioral markers for high-risk Internet gambling’ (2010) European Journal of Public Health, 1-6.

A Broda, D A LaPlante, S E Nelson, R A LaBrie, L B Bosworth, and H J Shaffer ‘Virtual harm reduction efforts for Internet gambling: Effects of deposit limits on actual Internet sports gambling behavior’ (2008) Harm Reduction Journal, 5, 27.

A Cabot and R Hannum‘Poker: Public Policy, Law, Mathematics and the Future of an American Tradition’ (2008) T.M. Cooley Law Review, 22, 443-513.

EU-Commission ‘On on-line gambling in the Internal Market’ (2011) Green Paper.

I Fiedler and J-P Rock ‘Quantifying Skill in Games – Theory and Empirical Evidence for Poker’ (2009) Gaming Law Review and Economics, 13, 50-57.

I Fiedler and A-C Wilcke Der Markt für Onlinepoker. Spielerherkunft und Spielerverhalten (Norderstedt, BoD Verlag, 2011)

I Fiedler and A-C Wilcke ‘The Market for Online Poker’ (2011a) forthcoming, download at SSRN:

G H Guyatt, D L Sackett and D J Cook ‘User’s guide to the medical literature: II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention: A. Are the results of this study valid?’(1993). JAMA, 270(21), 2598-2601.

M L Katz and C Shapiro ‘Network externalities, competition, and compatibility’ (1985)American Economic Review, 75, 424-440.

R A LaBrie, D A LaPlante, S E Nelson, A Schumann and H J Shaffer ‘Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behavior’ (2007) Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 347-362.

R A LaBrie, S A Kaplan, D A LaPlante, S E Nelson and H J Shaffer‘ Inside the virtual casino: A prospective longitudinal study of actual Internet casino gambling’ (2008) European Journal of Public Health, 18(4), 410-416.

R A LaBrie, and H J Shaffer ‘Identifying behavioral markers of disordered Internet sports gambling’ (2011) Addiction Research, & Theory, 19(1), 56-65.

M W Langewisch and R G Frisch ‘Classification of Pathological Gambling as an Impulse Control Disorder’ (2002) The electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 3.

D A LaPlante, A Schumann, R A LaBrie, and H J Shaffer ‘Population trends in Internet sports gambling’ (2008) Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2399-2414.

D A LaPlante, J H Kleschinsky, R A LaBrie, S E Nelson and H J Shaffer ‘Sitting at the virtual poker table: A prospective epidemiological study of actual Internet poker gambling behavior’ (2009) Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 711-717.

S E Nelson, D A LaPlante, A J Peller, A Schumann, R A LaBrie and H J Shaffer ‘Real limits in the virtual world: Self-limiting behavior of Internet gamblers’ (2008) Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 463-477.

Partygaming (2009), ‘Annual Report 2008’.

M N Potenza, M A Steinberg, P Skudlarski, R K Fulbright, C M Lacadie, M K Wilber, B J Rounsaville, J C Gore and B E Wexler ‘Gambling urges in pathological gambling: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study’ (2003)Archives of General Psychiatry, No. 160, 1990–1994.

H J Shaffer, A Peller, D A LaPlante, S E Nelson and R A LaBrie ‘Toward a paradigm shift in Internet gambling research: From opinion and self-report to actual behavior’ (2010). Addiction Research, &Theory, 18(3), 270-283.

G Smith, M Levere and R Kurtzman ‘Poker Player Behavior After Big Wins and Big Losses’ (2009), Management Science 55(9), 1547-1555.

J Weinstock and N M Petry ‘Professional & Pathological Gamblers: Similarities and Differences’ (2009) Paper presented at 14th International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Lake Tahoe.

Z Xuan and H J Shaffer ‘How do gamblers end gambling: Longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems’ (2009) Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(2), 239-252.