Testing for Dependency, Autocorrelation and Weak Information Efficiency in Horse Race Rankings Time Series

Article Sidebar

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (GBP 25)
Published: Sep 12, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v8i2.883

Main Article Content

Mikael Linden
Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland/Joensuu campus , Box 111, Yliopistokatu 2 (Aurora II), Joensuu, FIN-80101. Tel. +358405457699 mika.linden@uef.fi.

Abstract

Time series of horse trotting race outcomes (rankings) are analysed and tested with time series methods. Horse race rankings are low valued integers that are typical for Poisson processes. Testing for temporal independency in rankings series is conducted with different tests.  We focus on 456 series -  both on observed and on expected rankings (odds)  -  and show that close to 40% of analysed observed  series and close to 20% of expected series have significant, mainly  non-negative, autocorrelations.  These are not sensitive to the average ranking levels that the horses have obtained across the races they have finished.  In average the observed rankings series show larger persistence than expected rankings. The close relationship between observed and expected rankings and non-independency results imply that a typical weak-form of information efficiency or forecast unbiasedness testing framework can be applied to horse level rankings series. Interestingly some information efficiency results are found mainly under maintained hypothesis, the difference between observed and expected rankings.  It is argued that OLS methods are not necessary suitable in this context as the rankings series are integer valued and expected rankings are sensitive to bettors’ risk aversion. 

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2014)
Section
Articles

References

M M Ali ‘Probability models on horse-race outcomes’ Journal of Applied Statistics (1988) 25 221-229.

R N Bolton and R G Chapman ‘Searching for positive returns at the track: a multinomial logit model for handicapping horse races’ Management Science (1986) 32 1040-1060.

JY Campbell, A W Lo and A C MacKinlay The Econometrics of Financial Markets (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1997)

C A Cameron and P K Trivedi Regression Analysis of Count Data (2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013).

D Edelman ‘Adapting support vector machine methods for horserace odds prediction’ Annales of Operations Research (2007) 151 325-336.

K Fokianos ‘Count time series models’ in T Subba Rao, S Subba Rao and C R Rao (eds.) Handbook of Statistics Vol. 30 (Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2012) pp 215-347.

____ ‘Some recent progress in count time series’ Statistics (2011) 45 49-58.

K Freeland Statistical Analysis of Discrete Time Series with Applications to the Analysis of Worker’s Compensation Claims (Vancouver, UBC PhD thesis, 1998).

J D Gibbons and S Chakraborti Nonparametric Statistical Inference (3rd ed. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1992).

G Gourieroux and J Jasiak Financial Econometrics (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2001).

N J Johnson and S Kotz Univariate Discrete Distributions (New York, Wiley 1969).

C K Jung, M Kukuk and R Liesenfeld ‘Time series of count data: modelling, estimation, and diagnostics’ Computational Statistics & Data Analysis (2006) 51 2350-2364.

R C Jung and A R Tremayne ‘Useful models for time series of counts or simply wrong ones’ Advances in Statistical Analysis (2011) 95 59-91.

____ ‘Coherent forecasting of in integer time series models’ International Journal of Forecasting (2006) 22 223-238.

____ ‘Testing for serial dependence in time series models of counts’ Journal of Time Series Analysis (2003) 24 65-84.

T C Mills and R N Markellos The Econometric Modelling of Financial Time Series (3rd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008).

M Sung and J E V Johnson, J.E.V. ‘Semi-strong form information efficiency in horse race betting markets, in D B Hausch and W T Ziemba (eds) Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets ((Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2008) pp 275-306.

____ ‘Comparing the efficiency of one- and two-step conditional logit models for predicting outcomes in a speculative market’ Journal of Prediction Markets (2007) 1 43-59.

W T Ziemba ‘Efficiency of racing, sports, and lottery markets” in D B Hausch and W T Ziemba (eds) Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets ((Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2008) pp 181- 222.

L Vaughan Williams (ed.) Information Efficiency in Financial and Betting Markets (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2005).

_____ The Economics of Gambling (London, Routledge, 2003).

R Winkelmann Econometric Analysis of Count Data (4th ed. Berlin, Springer 2003).